The last time Labor made an exhaustive effort to answer this question the
result was 'Creative Nation'.
It was overly ambitious in some ways, but well ahead of its time and arguably
the most serious attempt yet to join together art, culture and the huge changes
underway in communications technology in a holistic policy document.
To generalise; in the recent past Labor has emphasised access and equity in
relation to arts policy, whilst the Liberals stress supporting institutions and
heritage art forms.
And notwithstanding these differences a kind of benign bipartisanship in
relation to arts funding has existed up to this point.
This is partly a reflection of the poor cousin status the Arts occupies in
Australian life. It is also due in no small part to the fact that the Arts are
often seen as an optional extra by politicians-afraid it seems to champion
something perceived as on the fringe or elite.
Yet we have been very willing to celebrate artistic achievements when they
happen, especially on an international stage, or draw on Indigenous culture in
constructing a national narrative at events like the Sydney Olympics 2000
opening ceremony.
Still the share of the economic pie the Arts receives is minuscule.
The amount of public support and subsidy for the Arts remains low and
professional artists, many of whom are regulars at Centrelink, experience
relentless carping about arts funding by some commentators who see red every
time a piece of experimental or provocative art is produced with government
patronage.
It remains an article of faith for many who write about these things that the
provision of support by the tax payer for artistic endeavour is much less
important than, say, taxpayer support for a football World Cup bid.
Yet there is growing evidence of the contribution that arts learning and
practice makes to wellbeing, particularly in the case of early childhood
development, and also to the economic vitality of regions and cities, where arts
related creative enterprises are established.
It is these areas, along with the clear need to originate expanded forms of
public and private investment for the broad Arts sector that have emerged as
central issues in the development of an arts policy to serve Australia in the
new century.
Education and creative industries, especially in the so-called 'new media',
would be key components.
Provision of adequate arts education is critical because it is here that
talent, greater engagement and the development of a life long appetite for the
Arts is nurtured. And the link between learning a musical instrument, for
example, and enhanced numeracy and cooperation skills is increasingly being
recognised.
Encouraging the creative economy is central because the quickening tempo of
web based creativity often morphs into product innovation and business
start-ups. Many of the software designers for Australia's highly successful
games industry began their journey doodling in cyber-design.
The dividing line between creativity which results in a work of art and
creative expression which ends up being harnessed to develop new software
products for instance, and which employs substantial numbers of people, is
increasingly blurred.
Figures released by the ‘Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for
Creative Industries and Innovation’ highlights the expanded levels of employment
of nearly half a million people - twice as many as previously thought - that can
be sheeted home to creative industries.
We face a growing deficit in the digital economies, where previously
Australia has been a 'first mover' in adapting new ideas. Governments must
develop policies which recognise this fact and integrate and stimulate funding
arrangements to allow creative research and continuing innovation to grow
sustainable businesses.
Other stand out issues to emerge include: the need to seriously address the
current state of the film and television industry where the numbers and
successes in Australian productions are static; the weaknesses in the current
Australia Council funding model which means the long term sustainability of many
small and medium sized dance and theatre companies is in jeopardy; and the lack
of flexibility in the social welfare system where artists' peculiar
circumstances -in work one minute, out of work the next-go unheeded.
The conspicuous lack of a suitable taxation, research and peer recognition
framework for creative artists is also seen as a major impediment to building a
dynamic, creative arts sector.
Finally there is the issue of direct involvement by government in funding
decisions. In a climate where some commentators continue to pit the Arts and
sport against one another and where the Howard government has been intent on
shoring up various boards and bodies with ideologically based appointments,
Australian artists desire a system which is sufficiently removed from false
debates and political pressure and has sufficient long term investment to allow
their creativity to flourish - they deserve nothing less.
Peter Garrett is Labor Spokesman for the Arts