Search

Archive

Transcript: Doorstop, IWC, Santiago, Chile

23 June 2008

The Hon Peter Garrett AM
Federal Member for Kingsford Smith
Minister for the Environment, Heritage and the Arts

E&OE proof only

REPORTER: The concern of some environment groups are that with the Chair discouraging voting, what this means for some countries by discouraging any constructive debate.

MINISTER GARRETT: Look, we expect to have constructive debate in the Commission because we have brought forward really positive proposals for change. We want this conservation of whales agenda to be seriously considered.

Past Commissions have been pretty acrimonious and if the Chair is proposing methods which might have less argument and more debate that happens in committees and don’t necessarily go to the vote, then we would work cooperatively with that.

REPORTER: But with no votes, some suggest to a certain extent it is gagging debate.

MINISTER: In the past, votes have been taken and they have had no real effect. And I think what we want to see is really fair dinkum, constructive discussion about the issues that are right at the front of the agenda here – conservation of whales, looking at collaborative research with other countries, shutting down the loopholes on so called scientific whaling.  Now if the chair wants to let the Commission have those discussions in a way which doesn’t see resolutions coming onto the floor, well let’s see how that operates for the next day or two and we’ll work constructively and cooperatively with him.

REPORTER: So, you’re not too concerned about no votes?

MINISTER: Well, not at this stage because I think that we’re in the early part of the Commission and what we want to see is how the emerging debate actually operates through the Commission processes – the committees and so on.  At the end of the day it is not about taking votes onto the floor which, frankly, don’t bind any countries to do anything. It is about charting a new course for conservation, having a cooperative approach to the Commission, and in Australia’s case, because we’ve brought forward major proposals for reform, ensuring that there is good discussion about those proposals amongst all countries.

ENDS

epbc fact sheet

Find out about the role of the EPBC Act with proposals such as the Sugarloaf Pipeline or the Shoalwater Bay rail and port.



Pete's tips


A dishwasher can generate up to 500 kilograms of greenhouse gas a year.


Look for dishwashers with a 4-star water efficiency rating. (Water-efficient dishwashers are usually energy efficient.)

Only run fully loaded dishwashers.

Use the shortest program sufficient to clean the dishes.

Clean the filter regularly to maintain washing performance.

See www.energyrating.gov.au


Water efficiency matters too.


The most efficient dishwashers use half the water of average models.

By 2016, the Water Efficiency Labelling and Standards scheme (WELs) could save nearly 1200 megalitres a year in national dishwasher water consumption – that's enough water to fill 600 Olympic swimming pools each year.

This represents a reduction of about 6.5 per cent in the water consumption of the dishwashers sold between 2003 and 2016.

See www.waterrating.gov.au

 

» more tips