Mr GARRETT (Kingsford Smith) (4.44 p.m.)—I rise to speak on the matter of
West Papua. The Australian Labor Party has a long and proud record on human
rights, and it is an area of real interest to me as a member of this parliament.
That strong stance is set out in considerable detail in the ALP platform, which
explicitly states:
Labor considers the promotion of universal human rights to be a core foreign
policy objective that cannot be traded off against other diplomatic and economic
goals.
Respect for human rights—the dignity and welfare of our fellow humans—is
naturally our first and most immediate response to reports of human rights
abuses. However, Labor also believes that respect for human rights is an
important consideration in international relations. Respect for human rights
contributes to domestic peace and stability and economic prosperity. This in
turn contributes to the maintenance of international security.
In this regard, I have been greatly concerned, as others have, by reports
from church groups and human rights organisations about incidents of police and
military brutality in the Indonesian province of West Papua. Most disturbing are
the reports of the Indonesian army’s involvement in the murder of Papuan
independence leader Theys Eluay in 2001. In particular, I draw the attention of
the House to a report that was submitted to the UN Economic and Social Council
on 9 March this year by Franciscans International on behalf of a number of
respected and credible church groups, including the Catholic Institute for
International Relations, the Protestant Church in Germany, Dominicans for
Justice and Peace, and the World Council of Churches. That report noted that
human rights abuses, including torture, arbitrary arrest and detention, and
displacement, were continuing in Papua.
There is no doubt that during the bad old days of the Suharto government the
Papuan people were subjected to gross violations of their human rights. In
addition to military brutality and political oppression, the province was
neglected by Jakarta, with the Papuans lagging behind the rest of the country by
virtually every standard of human development—infant mortality, literacy and
life expectancy. The fall of the Suharto government and the subsequent election
of President Wahid in 2000 gave rise to real optimism that a new era in Papua
would unfold. It is important to acknowledge that there have been some positive
developments, including the introduction of a special autonomy law granting
Papuans political freedoms and autonomy. But the fact remains that we continue
to receive disturbing reports of human rights abuses in Papua. Labor are very
concerned about these reports. It is our view that a failure to address ongoing
human rights concerns will only serve to undermine Indonesian authority in the
province.
Labor are also very disappointed at the failure to fully implement the law,
which was passed by the Indonesian parliament in 2002. We have made our concerns
clear to the Indonesian government and will continue to do so. The Leader of the
Opposition and the shadow foreign minister, Kevin Rudd, took the opportunity
provided by the recent visit to Australia by Indonesian President Susilo Bambang
Yudhoyono to raise their concerns about the human rights situation in West Papua
and the failure to implement the special autonomy law. Shadow minister Rudd made
it clear when he said:
... when it comes to human rights abuses or allegations of human rights
abuses in Papua ... we have an expectation that the government in Jakarta will
attend to those matters ... at a thorough level.
Still, it is clear from reports recently made public, including Genocide in
West Papua?—and the question mark following this title raises legitimate
questions about whether it is the right term to use here; we do not think that
it is—that the situation is of concern. That particular report, from the Centre
for Conflict and Peace Studies, shows that the situation in West Papua continues
to deteriorate and is very serious. Health conditions in some areas are very
poor. The fact that special autonomy has not reached grassroots levels means
there remain continuing infringements of people’s rights. This is serious. So it
is essential that this parliament provide encouragement to the Indonesian
government to speedily advance those arrangements identified as necessary for
the implementation of the special autonomy law.
We have welcomed President Yudhoyono’s success in negotiating a peace
agreement in Aceh. His decision to grasp the opportunity provided in the wake of
the tsunami to rebuild not just the bricks and mortar of the province but also
civil society is acknowledged. It is now time for similar energies and
commitment to be brought to bear for the people of West Papua.